Re: LiteStep Progress website

I agree with this sentiment. I don't use litestep.net because of the 
required login...

Making people who may only be curious about litestep have to create an 
account just to see some info is off putting.


Alan Polacek wrote:
> I would imagine that being required to have an account to litestep.net is
> quite a put-off. I know it was for me way back when, and honestly, I don't
> ever check there because there's nothing particularly useful that i ever
> find. My first stop for updates these days is ls-universe.info, and poking
> around #litestep to see what's going on.
> 
> -Alan Polacek
> -pfx
> 
> On 8/17/07, Arve Barsnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Great! If I put my work where my mouth is I will be trying to set up
>> LiteStep at work, which will be my first time running LS in about 2
>> years. Any activity will help any colleagues who are intrigued by my
>> possibly awesome theme :P
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>>         LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>>             Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>>
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org