Re: LiteStep and Linux?
chris <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:18:42 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What makes Litestep... Litestep is simply a plain text based
configuration system that loads plugins and provides access to Windows
shell resources for those plugins. Litestep is a *replacement* shell
(keep that in mind).
The thing that people don't understand is that *underneath* of Litestep
is a standardized OS and shell services that doesn't vary much from one
person's desktop to the next. So regardless of how archaic Litestep may
be to some peoples view point, they can still work with it because
everything else on their OS is familiar (notepad, explorer file manager,
alt+tab, download-able install packages etc). There is no learning
curve beyond Litestep.
Now jump into Linux... a whole different story. There are desktop
environments (DE) out there that are also a plain text file
configuration that load plugins. Not really any different than what we
see in Litestep. The biggest difference is what is running under the
DE... the resources provided. Because the OS setup could be any
combination of distro, window manager etc, this type of DE does not get
a lot of support or plugins written for it, and the plugins that do get
written for it are probably not going to target the same resources you
have available on your system.
So, the big fellas, KDE, GNOME... the ones that have included the
kitchen sink, well for these a lot of plugins have been written. But
like Explorer, the target audience doesn't want to mess with
configuration as much, and therefor the configuration can't be free-form.
Remember I mentioned that Litestep is a *replacement* shell? Well, you
could take a KDE system as your "standard", and replace the KDE
configuration system and plugin architecture with a different one,
utilizing all other aspects of a KDE install. As when replacing
Explorer in Windows, one would have to offer interfaces to the KDE
services etc. With that, you would now have a replacement shell for KDE
systems (whether that replacement shell was written in the vein of
geoshell, bblean, or litestep is besides the point).
"Litestep for Linux" is an oxymoron.
chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org