RE: State of the Step April 2008
"Hale, Paul" <paul.hale-X7qyDxFx8/lR5dUNPGT/[email protected]> Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:46:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D8E5563202C45A42A9E00AB6F92D617A7F8C9B@01ohday01n00005.ad.bls.com> |
> -----Original Message-----
> As far as Litestep/LiteStep, I am fine with either. It seems to me
that
> the
> second is slightly more formal than the singlecap version. FWIW. I
suspect
> that I'll continue to use the first most of the time, since it's one
fewer
> key to press. :)
>
> -Alan Polacek
> pfx
Since we are all about alternative, why not "litestep"? e.e. cummings
would be proud. I personally always liked Omar's Litestep wallpaper in
that scribbled white lowercase lettering.
As a side question. Those of you trying out litestep on Vista, is there
a noticeable memory and/or performance difference? I cannot barely stand
using Vista because of the performance.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org