Re: LiteStep on Vista
"Tobbe Lundberg" <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:01:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ilmcuts recently picked up Vista development again and the code in CVS is significantly better than the latest release. So I would recommend getting a fresh build off of cvs and try running that. //Tobbe On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Bjoern Brembs <[email protected]> wrote: > Fellow 'Steppers, > > I have recently come over a new laptop with Vista > pre-installed. I will definitely not work without LiteStep, > so I face the task of either installing XP (forfeiting, e.g. > Office 2007) or dealing with hiccups in using LS. > How usable is the very latest, unstable version under Vista? > Has there been any significant progress since the last State > of the Step in April, where it said: "Still, LiteStep 0.24.8 > should be usable on Vista. Maybe not the Betas, but the > final release should." > How far are you guys? > > Thanks for keeping LiteStep up to date! > > Bjoern > > > -- > Björn Brembs > --------------------------------------------- > http://brembs.net > Neurobiology > Freie Universität Berlin > Germany > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html > LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php > Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org