Re: Re: First 0.25.0 Alpha build w/ Vista support

Very nice to see a new build!  Lack of LS support was one of the major 
things that was holding me back from moving to Vista (I refuse to use 
explorer shell on my personal PC.  It's bad enough putting up with it at 
work).  I've only been running it for a few days, but it seems pretty 
solid so far, for an alpha.  Module hiding appears to work better (no 
more flickering in Fallout 3,  I used to have to manually toggle all my 
bars off).  I am noticing one issue, and that is that all the startup 
items in the two "startup" folders in the start menu are not being run 
at all (I'm on XP, SP3).  Is this a known issue?

chris wrote:
> Piotr Borys wrote:
>> Oh man.... that's a fantastic news :)  Finally LS on my notebook, too
>> - thus all my 3 machines will be running LS :D
>>
>> Are there any other interesting new things in this experimental code?
>> I mean, is it worth of checking on my XP machine?
>>
>> cheers and thanks!
>
> Just what you see in the readme.txt changes.  The only main difference 
> you'll see on XP vs running the latest 0.24.8 RC is that this 
> experimental build plays various sounds the shell is responsible for.
>
> chris
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org