Re: ping
Kevin Brew <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2010 20:56:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wow, that's pretty sad. I hadn't even realized I was still subscribed =20=
to the lsml from this address.
I have to say that most of the reasons I began to use LS don't exist =20
anymore, but it still has quite a bit of utility. I still have xp on =20
one of my computers, and six months ago I got seriously sick of =20
explorer, and just happened to trip over the folder containing all of =20=
the loose-screws stuff. Now I have an entire interface built into a =20
20x200px space again. Whether it's being actively worked on or not, =20
it's stable, it works, and it does what it's supposed to.
But, it's definitely sad to see how small the community has gotten. =20
That was always the best part of it, arguments and all. Not many =20
things will get me to do data entry for days and days, but apparently, =20=
this bunch was enough.
--Kevin Brew (cypress)
On May 11, 2010, at 19:54, "Mike Edward Moras (e-sushi=E2=84=A2)" =
<[email protected]=20
et> wrote:
> Oh well, back in the days the "state of the step" was showing first =20=
> signs of death... but I didn't expect everything to fade away.
>
> Makes me wonder where all those skinners and themers have gone.
>
> On the other hand you're right: MS is so much more stable than back =20=
> in the original Win98 era. It's just... I miss my skins. ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org