Re: ping
Elliot Nesterman <[email protected]> Wed, 12 May 2010 23:47:41 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
@Jeremy: All excellent points, and well taken. You should argue more, people could learn something. I moved to BB4Win 'cause I didn't think there was a stable release of LS for x64. I think I'm just confused by what you mean when you say Linux is a toy. There are tens of thousands of mission-critical, enterprise servers all over the world running one distro or another. There are scads of scientific applications being run on linux clusters. 19 of the top 20 of the world's supercomputers run Linux. http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/06/24/the-triumph-of-linux-as-a-supercomputer-os/ Google runs on Linux. So using the word toy seems a bit odd, and lightweight doesn't seem appropriate given the weightiness of the responsibilities given to those servers. On the desktop, it all depends on what you need to do with it, after all. For the vast majority of users, people who use computers casually for email, web, twitter, simple documents, media, etc. any modern OS will suffice. For professional use, it all depends on your profession. I run a Win workstation because Adobe software won't run on Linux, and I have neither need nor desire to pay the Apple tax. As I move away from print graphics and more towards video I could even see using Gimp, Inkscape and Cinelerra on Linux, as I wouldn't need the more advanced features of Photoshop or Illustrator. But not having After Effects is a deal breaker. Anyway, thanks for your response, and your critique of Win7. Looks like I'll not be moving to that anytime soon. Jeremyhfht wrote: > @Elliot: I don't normally bother to argue, but I am really sick of hearing > "hurrrrrr you didn't use the new awesome distro hurrrrr" from Linux fanboys. > I'm a *computer engineer *and have a server *in my freaking house*. It's > linux OS based, and uses virtual partitions to host multiple OS's (I use a > thin client model *in my house*). I have practically every Linux distro > available through virtual environments on my PC (I do a lot of tech > support), MOST of my software is linux-based (very few computers I fix are > bootable), *and I used linux for 1 year as my desktop OS.* I can definitely > say that, yes, linux is a *toy*. It's a very specialized and lightweight > toy, but it's NOT a good desktop OS because the linux community *still > doesn't admit that it's a toy*. If I have to fight something for general-use > productivity, I am not going to use that program. Worst part is that > *all*of the GUI's available for linux have worse human interface > guidelines than > any other OS. *Except windows 7*. I'd use a Mac before I would use Linux OR > windows 7 as my desktop OS. My favorite case of Linux-brand failure was when > the package manager could not update in a distro *because whoever was in > charge of updating the public key hadn't done so 3 months after it had > expired*. > > The rest of you calling Windows 7 "so awesome" compared to Windows XP are > missing the point entirely. No, windows 7 is not awesome, *and goes out of > its way to bury backward compatibility* *for the opposite of awesome*. > Windows 7 is egomaniacal to the point of deleting the classic start menu > scheme. Their own theme is so horrible they added a search bar! That's not > an improvement on a GUI, that's GIVING UP on the GUI! Everything is > organized in a significantly more confusing manner than ever before, and as > I interact with hundreds of users monthly (I fix computers) I know for a > fact that *the average user hates the GUI too!* Everyone uses the search > bar! Then you have the wonderful dialog that pops up when you do a > copy->move. Remember the simple and eloquent "Do you want to replace this > file? Y/N"? Well, for your viewing PLEASURE (and to refresh your memory), > try this image: http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/5512/win7copy.png > > That is not an exception, that's the rule. So you can all enjoy your ride to > the bottom of the stairs, I'm staying with windows XP x64 and LiteStep until > SOMEONE comes up with an OS worth using that can be customized as much as > LiteStep. > > -- Elliot Nesterman [email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * The closer you are to the code the happier you are. - Ancient Geek Proverb --------------------------------------------------------------------- Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org