Re: ping

I started using LiteStep because I thought explorer was very inefficient 
and I could do it a million times better myself. Plus I was tweaking 
every part of windows back in the days so it really made sense to go all 
out and complete it with LS :)

Btw, I'm still running LS on all my machines except for my laptop which 
runs Win7. Though recently I had a brainfart which gave my a way to get 
win7 quicklists working in LS. Once I do (if I ever get myself coding LS 
again) that lappy will switch to LS too.

Still running a slightly updated version of this theme: 
http://www.ls-themes.org/screenshots/acidic-frost

On 05/13/10 10:56, Red wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what made you (everyone) switch to LS in the first place?
>
> For me it was crash protecting 98.  I already had a customized desktop (that
> one person thought was LiteStep, actually).  I needed LS just to keep me old
> machine running.
>
> Fast forwarding to modern day...
>
> I really wanted to use LS with the alpha transparency (remember when that
> was new), but we all know that didn't exist in 98.  So, when I switched to
> XP, I got all the eye candy I could only gaze upon from afar.  Up to the
> minute, I need the space LS gives me on my netbook, and it works great with
> how I have Rainmeter set on my desktop.
>
> On a side note, part of the reason I'm not using win7 is because it doesn't
> work with LS and other programs.  It might as well be linux for me.  I've
> gotten things pretty well set b/t LS&  Rainmeter:
> http://rainmeter.net/forum/download/file.php?id=1847&mode=view/cuttheredwire-20100313.jpg
>
>    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org