Re: #litestep
"Jochen Ritzel" <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:16:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <op.vgau9foxifobub@w00t> |
Am 23.07.2010, 15:50 Uhr, schrieb Antoine W. Campagna <AntoineW-/[email protected]>: >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2286198 > Well that's something, I thought it was a joke when reading it. Do they > recommend to everybody to install this fix ? > But I am wondering how LS reads icons and maybe it's using the same > API/Library and would also be vulnerable. Litestep runs with user privileges, but the Windows code that bug affects has higher privileges and this makes it a problem. This means that even if Litestep is affected, exploiting this only means you can delete everything of the current user -- something any Litestep theme can do by default :P The workaround simply disables all icons, so it's not really a fix. As long as you don't open anything from sources you cannot absolutely trust (as always), you're as safe as you can get with Windows ;-) Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org