Re: LS development

--90e6ba6e842aae9ba804939d2ed2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yay!  Eventually I'm going to have to get a new PC and that will have Win7.

For now, no prob.  I'm on XP.

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Richard Humphreys <
r_j_humphreys-/[email protected]> wrote:

> Dead?
>
> I don't know about modern OSes - but there are plenty of 'netbook' users
> like
> myself who are running XP and enjoying the benefits that LS has to offer.=
..
>
> R.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Bj=F6rn Brembs <[email protected]>
> To: litestep-HzvBz7w1J3cIFlVeWT/[email protected]
> Sent: Wed, 27 October, 2010 14:12:29
> Subject: [Litestep] LS development
>
> Dear remaining few 'Steppers,
>
> I just checked lsdev.org and the last posted
> 'alpha' build is from 29-04-04 and CVS doesn't
> show any new files since then either.
>
> Is it safe to assume that LS is now finally
> deceased and dead for good?
>
> Bjoern
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bj=F6rn Brembs
> ---------------------------------------------
> http://brembs.net
> Neurobiology
> Freie Universit=E4t Berlin
> Germany
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>

--90e6ba6e842aae9ba804939d2ed2--