Re: LS development
Erik Welander <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:26 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--0016364586c8c99d140493a9805a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The "crash" problems that you will sometimes have on 64bit systems usually don't come from the 64bit system. They are a result of old modules which ar= e incompatible with 0.25, which you'll need to use on a 64bit system. 2010/10/28 Bj=F6rn Brembs <[email protected]> > Eric Alan Solo wrote: > > > i run litestep on 64 bit win7, the latest alpha seems to run "ok", the > > two problems i've encountered are: > > - The system icons in the taskbar are > > visible but not operational > > (previous versions of ls they were not even present) > > - It tends to crash sometimes, requiring me to ctrl + alt + del > > and run it again, seems to crash on startup all the time now though it > > didn't always. > > So no problems with any of the modules not > running? > Maybe I should try running LS on my 64bit > systems... > > Bjoern > > > > > > -- > Bj=F6rn Brembs > --------------------------------------------- > http://brembs.net > Neurobiology > Freie Universit=E4t Berlin > Germany > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html > LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php > Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org > > --0016364586c8c99d140493a9805a--