Re: LS development

Erik Welander <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:55:26 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--0016364586c8c99d140493a9805a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The "crash" problems that you will sometimes have on 64bit systems usually
don't come from the 64bit system. They are a result of old modules which ar=
e
incompatible with 0.25, which you'll need to use on a 64bit system.

2010/10/28 Bj=F6rn Brembs <[email protected]>

> Eric Alan Solo wrote:
>
> > i run litestep on 64 bit win7, the latest alpha seems to run "ok", the
> > two problems i've encountered are:
> >     - The system icons in the taskbar are
> > visible but not operational
> > (previous versions of ls they were not even present)
> >     - It tends to crash sometimes, requiring me to ctrl + alt + del
> > and run it again, seems to crash on startup all the time now though it
> > didn't always.
>
> So no problems with any of the modules not
> running?
> Maybe I should try running LS on my 64bit
> systems...
>
> Bjoern
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Bj=F6rn Brembs
> ---------------------------------------------
> http://brembs.net
> Neurobiology
> Freie Universit=E4t Berlin
> Germany
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
>        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
>            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org
>
>

--0016364586c8c99d140493a9805a--