Re: [Unattended] HID mouse drivers

El 18/03/11 23:30, [email protected] escribió:
>
> Most of the PCs that I have been using Unattended with are several 
> years old, and all of them have PS/2 keyboard and mouse ports. I have 
> received a shipment of newer PCs that don't have the legacy ports, and 
> are USB only. When I install Windows XP SP3 on these new machines, the 
> keyboard and mouse work fine because they were detected during the 
> setup. However, when I deploy the machine, here is where I run into 
> the problem...
>
> The keyboard and mouse that get connected to the PC are different 
> brands than what I used during installation. To make things more fun, 
> there are now 6 to 8 USB ports on these PCs and the devices may not 
> have been plugged into the same port as was used during install. The 
> result: No mouse or keyboard is detected, and the user cannot login.
>
> I can fix this only if I perform the following:
>
> connect the exact same keyboard that I used during setup to the exact 
> same port that I used during setup.
> login as admin.
> go into Device Manager.
> Expand Human Interface Devices.
> Right-click on "HID-compliant device" and choose to update the driver.
> Install drivers from a list, and don't search.
>
> At this point, I get 2 drivers to choose from:
>
> HID-compliant device (which is signed by Microsoft)
> HID-compliant mouse (which is unsigned)
>
> I select the HID-compliant MOUSE, it updates the drivers, and now the 
> mouse works. Perform the same procedure for the keyboard, but choose 
> HID-compliant keyboard.
>
> This seems way too complicated for what should really be 
> "plug-and-play". Why is windows not seeing a USB mouse as a MOUSE? I 
> thought that maybe the HID-compliant device driver that was signed was 
> overriding the mouse driver because it wasn't signed, but I have 
> DriverSigningPolicy = Ignore in the unattended.txt file.
>
> Is there a driver that I should add or a change that I can make to get 
> Windows to properly recognize the most important devices connected to 
> the machine?
>
> This is really a bummer if I have to ship the machine to a remote 
> user, and they can't even use it! ARGH! There was nothing wrong with 
> the PS/2 spec....
>

Did you try to put those drivers under the i386/$oem$ directory?

-- 
Quien no tiene confianza en el hombre, no tiene ninguna en Dios.
		-- Chapman.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d