Re: WTL News

"robert679078" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.wtl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
My 2c.  I have been using WTL since 2000 and recently completed a large project using it but have now switched to using Qt for new C++ development as it is now LGPL and the cross-platform aspect is becoming more important to our business (Mac more than Linux at the moment).  As far as I can see MFC is dead, despite the addition of the BCG UI library, and the Qt framework is *much* more polished.

WTL is great for lightweight Windows apps but I do fear for it's future.  The traffic on this forum peaked years ago and begs the question of whether there is enough impetus to keep moving WTL forward.

--- In [email protected], "Anna-Jayne Metcalfe" <yahoo@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
> 
> > Now the latest version of WTL is 8.1. Comparing with 8.0, it is just bug fixing.
> 
> > In my opinion, MFC is still under developing. Vista's new UI features are support by the latest MFC version. If you want to used lots UI Controls provided in .NET. Managed C++ is a choice.
> 
> MFC is still moving forwards, but only after a long period of stagnation and with the assimilation of third party components for ribbon support. MS never wrote that themselves as the version in Office was too closely coupled to the internal Office frameworks to make it worthwhile to port to an MFC version ....
> 
> Then of course you get all of the MFC party quirks and oddities from previous versions. They're very hot on backward compatibility (generally a good thing) but unfortunately with it being a circa-1990 framework that means you're wedded to a monolithic design with many compromises (try making sense of/customising the way frame windows work and you'll rapidly get the idea).
> 
> There is always going to be a tradeoff between completeness/bloat (MFC) and flexibility (WTL).
> 
> As a result of our experiences with both frameworks we've now moved all of our core projects from MFC to WTL in order to get the latter, and so far it's paying off handsomely - despite some extra work filling in gaps WTL doesn't handle "out of the box".
> 
> > There are many other open source C++ UI Framework, like GTK+, wxWidget...
> 
> That's always the case in the C++ world - the same is true of unit test frameworks, for example.
> 
> Incidentally, if you're looking for a cross-platform framework, Jim Crafton's VCF is worth a look at.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 	Anna x
> 
> 	http://www.riverblade.co.uk
> 	Twitterings: http://twitter.com/annajayne
>  	Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jalapenokitten/
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtl/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtl/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.