Re: Licensing for WTL 9.0?
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.windows.wtl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK3Hp+_yG3L03z69ZDO4+jN_bgjUpw=qNoLMtsF9e7qbM+LPRg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Jed, Thanks! Since WTL is not distributed by MS any more, I thought that we can continue using just CPL on SourceForge. We can still use MS-PL, if needed. Is there any specific issue why you are asking this? I would be interested to hear it. Cheers, Nenad p.s. I don't know what was the problem with posting - even this one appeared after 4 days. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:25 PM, jb_ni_dev-/[email protected] [wtl] < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Congratulations again on the release of WTL 9.0. > > > I have a question about licensing: Is WTL 9.0 distributed under both the > Microsoft Public License (MS-PL) and the Common Public License (CPL) as > older versions were? The Sourceforge download page references only the > CPL. The Wikipedia page has been updated to state the latest stable > release is 9.0, and still references both the MS-PL and CPL, but this does > not strike me as definitive. > > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > > Best Regards, > > > Jed > > > PS. I attempted to post this a little while back, but it does not seem to > have worked, so I am trying again. Apologies if it ends up doubled. > > >