Re: Licensing for WTL 9.0?

"Nenad Stefanović [email protected] [wtl]" <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:28:49 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.windows.wtl
Message-ID <CAK3Hp+_yG3L03z69ZDO4+jN_bgjUpw=qNoLMtsF9e7qbM+LPRg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jed,

Thanks!

Since WTL is not distributed by MS any more, I thought that we can continue
using just CPL on SourceForge. We can still use MS-PL, if needed.

Is there any specific issue why you are asking this? I would be interested
to hear it.

Cheers,
Nenad

p.s. I don't know what was the problem with posting - even this one
appeared after 4 days.


On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:25 PM, jb_ni_dev-/[email protected] [wtl] <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Congratulations again on the release of WTL 9.0.
>
>
> I have a question about licensing:  Is WTL 9.0 distributed under both the
> Microsoft Public License (MS-PL) and the Common Public License (CPL) as
> older versions were?  The Sourceforge download page references only the
> CPL.  The Wikipedia page has been updated to state the latest stable
> release is 9.0, and still references both the MS-PL and CPL, but this does
> not strike me as definitive.
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Jed
>
>
> PS.  I attempted to post this a little while back, but it does not seem to
> have worked, so I am trying again. Apologies if it ends up doubled.
>
>  
>