XFCE package names in Gentoo
[email protected] Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:42:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfce.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[ i have just had the following exchange with the Gentoo development list. perhaps the XFCE gang -- at least any Gentoo users -- might like to offer their own input & possibly consider referring to 'xfce4' simply as 'xfce' ] ----- Forwarded message from Brandon Hale <[email protected]> ----- Mailing-List: contact [email protected]; run by ezmlm List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: [email protected] Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected] Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:33:22 -0500 From: Brandon Hale <[email protected]> To: Gentoo Devt <[email protected]> Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo Devt <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] XFCE package names On (01/18/04 15:17), [email protected] wrote: > XFCE 4 has been out for nrly 6 mth & is proving very satisfactory. > XFCE 3 is no longer being developed or AFAIK supported. > however on Gentoo, 'emerge xfce' still gives you XFCE 3.18.3 , > while you have to say 'emerge xfce4' to get XFCE 4.0.1 (4.0.3 is latest). > > can those responsible please revise the package names (surely no effort) ? If you've ever used cvs, which we do for our portage tree, you will know that moving packages is far more painful than the "no effort" you suppose. Due to the number of packages that make up XFCE, suggesting such a large move would not be taken lightly. This has come up before, at which time the answer was this: xfce.org refers to their newest release as "xfce4" vs xfce. I can see logic in both sides of this argument, but hopefully we won't go back and forth ad naseum on a non-issue. I will consider this further, and speak w/ the package's maintainer on the issue when he returns. > 'xfce' sb XFCE 4.0.n , while 'xfce3' shd get the obsolete XFCE 3.18.3 . Ideally, both packages would share the same name. Someone wanting xfce 3.x would have to mask 4.x in /etc/portage/package.mask Regards, --tseng -- [email protected] mailing list ----- End forwarded message ----- -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [email protected] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto