[XFCE 0000016]: a bit of license dimness

A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
=======================================================================
http://bugs.xfce.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0000016
=======================================================================
Reporter:                   jimmy
Handler:                    
=======================================================================
Project:                    XFCE
Bug ID:                     0000016
Category:                   other
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   text
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
=======================================================================
Date Submitted:             2003-11-18 14:31 GMT
Last Modified:              2003-11-25 00:59 GMT
=======================================================================
Summary:                    a bit of license dimness
Description: 
I wanted to particularize the xfce-4 package licenses for ROCK-Linux, but
noticed some ambiguosities:
- xfce4-systray.spec says "GPL", but the COPYING included is BSD
(including 4.0.1).
- xffm-icons.spec says "GPL", but the COPYING included is empty.
- xfce4-themes.spec says "BSD, custom", but the LICENSE-s included are GPL
and custom [DESIGN SCIENCE LICENSE].
Can you please clarify these? Sounds stupid, I know... but in these
SCO-lawsuit days it's good to be 100% sure.

=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 olivier - 2003-11-24 22:56 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mailed developers about licence issues.

Olivier.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 edscott - 2003-11-25 00:59 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue fixed in xffm-icons (head and xfce_4_0)