Re: What happened to the fonts?

Bukie Mabayoje <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Marc Aurele La France wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
> >>>> Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >>>>>    I synced up and built and now, though the server starts fine,
> >>>>> apps can't get any fonts.  Window managers claim they can't find
> >>>>> fontsets like fixed so menus and such have no text in them.
> >>>>> xfontsel seems to work though.  Anyone know what's going on?
> >>>>> It's like the fonts.alias isn't being read anymore.  I can
> >>>>> see fixed in the fonts.alias and I can see the corresponding
> >>>>> font in the fonts.dir and I can see that the font file exists
> >>>>> and can verify that the server acknowledged that font path.
>
> >>>> I am looking into a similar problem too, when xfs is not running.
>
> >>> I've been able to make the fontset message appear with a simple test case
> >>> (holding down the control key and pressing any mouse button while the
> >>> pointer
> >>> is in an xterm).
>
> >>   I don't see that message with xterm.  TWM menus don't work though.
> >> But, if I run TWM remotely from another machine it works.  I think
> >> that implies that it's a problem with the local libraries.  Another
> >> data point, is a test app that opens "fixed" seems to work fine, so
> >> it's not the case that aliases are broken in general - just in some
> >> cases.
>
> >> Bukie, how long have you been seeing this problem?  I updated
> >> yesterday and saw it for the first time.  The last time I updated
> >> was Nov 26. so that gives a pretty large window.

It was reported in the xfree86 by someone else earlier this month. And I was able to reproduce it using their Linux distribution. I can't test it in red hat because Red hat always start xfs when running X. So I am currently trying to debug it using debian. The fact is X should run without xfs running.

>
>
> > Mark (and anyone else, of course),
>
> > Please tell me whether the attached patch fixes (your version of) the
> > problem.
>
> Umm.  That's not right.  Further investigation shows the xterm behaviour I
> was seeing was due to an NLS configuration error.  Also, the TWM menus I see
> look as expected.  Can you narrow down this problem a bit more?
>
> Marc.
>
> +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
> |  Marc Aurele La France           |  work:   1-780-492-9310           |
> |  Computing and Network Services  |  fax:    1-780-492-1729           |
> |  352 General Services Building   |  email:  [email protected]          |
> |  University of Alberta           +-----------------------------------+
> |  Edmonton, Alberta               |                                   |
> |  T6G 2H1                         |     Standard disclaimers apply    |
> |  CANADA                          |                                   |
> +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
> XFree86 developer and VP.  ATI driver and X server internals.
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Sorry, I  my mail system crashed and I lost some mail. That is why I didn't respond to your message.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.