Re: tdfx and DDC2
Michael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050830175750.474eb953@inishowen> |
Hello, > >>> the attached patch adds DDC2/I2C support to the tdfx driver which > >>> has the distinct advantage to work anywhere since it doesn't > >>> depend on the vbe module. It will try DDC2 first and if that fails > >>> fall back to the old vbe stuff when possible. > >>> Moved mode validation and related stuff /after/ monitor detection. > >> That looks reasonable. > >> Does the vbe/int10 portion still need to be disabled for PowerPC? > > I don't see why they should be enabled - they're PC-specific and > > even with x86 emulation they would be pretty much useless since > > you're not too likely to encounter a graphics board with PC firmware > > in a Mac ( or other PowerPC boxes ) > > That's _no_ reason to disallow them. After all even your Mac has PCI > slots, not Mac-PCI slots, because the later don't exist. But the chances that it will ever have a VESA BIOS or anything responding to int10 in a PCish way is extremely small. I agree, it shouldn't have to be #ifdef'ed out as it is, but these modules would be useless on almost any PowerPC machine. have fun Michael
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 478 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD) iQEVAwUBQxTWX8pnzkX8Yg2nAQJ2TAgAkgy8XWZtFk5bza1398K+kfsPawyBqsUz B8dR5qEUrRjDS/5ZpCWXxV8rxkJUa+ocDdW+ukD/vOTdXWIeCArvG9EQ7TAnf59f 0rkaerunP4+rclA//zTujPRuEoR3d1FEDUGUszzOvOADZPt1vOBaUSj9TLTfAw9W ZG04xvQweOtCm5Lz1gGOm2jfXWKWtXWhqPJCeeId/JhqtffNeEAMT16xTsak626i rEN0qXC6l8LeM0YfvcAAMCt6+ZJJAmwn5rM5lMvariloOs3lGpPK/9xwJm9MKQKF J6ETX4MHLQM4KsN7HFqE+0609NgPqjn84JlFv7+VVHCBAh84iTRZNQ== =9V4U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----