Re: siliconmotion CSync output ?
bruno schwander <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
in SMI_Save(), SR6C and SR6D (and SR68) are saved only if pSmi->Dualhead, why ? seems it should always be done ? in SMI_WriteMode, those 2 are written twice, once everytime + once if pSmi->Dualhead What's your take about CCR68 (SR68), also written only in dualhead mode... seems if SR6C/SR6D are to be active, SR68 has to be configured too. bruno On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > On 3/9/07, bruno schwander <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> > The latest version of the siliconmotion driver in xorg git head should >> > have the lockup fix you need. The problem is the engine doesn't need >> > to be synced until it has been started. I've also added dualhead >> > support. I haven't yet pushed the pll fix, that's still in my local >> > tree at home along with some other stuff I'm working on. I can send >> > you a patch later if you want. >> >> that would be awesome, yes ! so far what I added (enabling in CCR68 >> vclock scaled from CCR6C and CCR6D) crashes my pc... I used >> SMI_CommonCalcClock() but I get wrong values back for the register values. >> I am certainly not calling it right. > > I just put my local tree up here: > http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=users/agd5f/xf86-video-siliconmotion.git;a=summary > The relevant commit is a328d4378c28b788acf320bee9fbdfd129e0923d > > I haven't tested any of this new code yet, so YMMV. I haven't had > time this week and I need to rebuild my laptop with the smi chip, but > I hope to do that this weekend, at which point I should be able to > sort out any bugs. Let me know if you haven any questions. > > Alex > > >> >> bruno >> > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >