Re: [OFFTOPIC] spam scoring (was: *****SPAM***** Extracting a KeySym from an action routine)
James Hawtin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.expert |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 [email protected] wrote: > Spam only works because its one-to-many. Forcing a confirmation requires > many-to-one and will collapse a spam server (or be ignored, either way you > win). In addition, adding a two-way element avoids all the ethical issues > of blacklists. If someone really wants to post to the list that badly and > they score positive, they'll send the email verification. > Many spam messages either don;t have a valid reply address or use the of some poor soul who annoyed to the spammer. I hope however in the weighting that being subscribed will mean that spam scoring is turned off, well atleast against the RBL. James