Re: FreeBSD 5.0 XFree86 4_2_1 source anyone?

Yu-Shun Wang <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:27:53 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.expert
Organization USC /ISI
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I built and installed xfree86 from the head of cvs a while
ago under 5.0 because the one from port could not recognize
my ATI Radeon 9000. I did not have the problems you described
below, but keep in mind that my -CURRENT might be different
from your -CURRENT. :-)

Here's a snapshot from my world.lod:

===========================================================================
Building Release 6.6 of the X Window System.

I hope you checked the configuration parameters in ./config/cf
to see if you need to pass BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS.

Mon Dec 23 17:02:25 PST 2002
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
cd ./config/imake && make   -f Makefile.ini BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" clean
  ...
<snip>
  ...
make -f xmakefile   VerifyOS

Building on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 [ELF] (5.0.0).

GCC version: 3.2
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

<snip>

===========================================================================

Install went fine, too. Notice the date which is most likely the date
of the head of cvs for both FreeBSD CURRENT and XFree86.

I did have to install the XFree86 CVS build into a separate directory
(/usr/local/X11R6) while keeping the one from ports (/usr/X11R6) to
satisfy tons of port dependencies (such as gnome, etc.).

Just a data point for your reference because the version of gcc is
not the same as yours (3.2.1).

Cheers,

yushun.


[email protected] wrote:

> I've cvsup RELENG_5_0 yesterday, make kernel, make world.
> Then I've cvsup xf-4_2_1 into another source directory, make World, make
> install.
> make World gave warnings of no big big integers, but completed.
> make install failed because the FreeBSD.cf supplied apparently called for
> ansic.inc version that's different.
> [all names above I recall from memory, maybe slightly off..]
>
> Question: anyone has include file or source or patch or instruction to
> make above combination work?
> I'm guessing it's because 5.0 uses gcc 3.2.1 and not 2.9 anymore, and
> include files changed...
>
> If above combination is not good, any suggestions?  I'm starting off with
> a new hard drive, though I'm sort of committed now using FreeBSD 5.0.  (I
> also have it dual boot to Windows and Linux.)  As came with the cvsup,
> the ports supplied is Xfree86 3.3.6...
>
> Regards,
> Gilbert
>


-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
Yu-Shun Wang <[email protected]>               Information Sciences Institute
                                            University of Southern California