Re: Another teleconference partial edited transcript

David Dawes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:23:31AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
>Leon Shiman wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:27:10 -0600 Jens Owen wrote:
>> 
>>>Keith Packard wrote:
>>>
>>>>Another teleconference was held on 2003-4-3 to talk about X governance.
>>>>
>>>>	http://fontconfig.org/~keithp/teleconference/2003-04-03.html
>>>>
>>>>We held another teleconference today and resolved to publish minutes and 
>>>>the partial edited transcript tomorrow afternoon.  I'll post that URL
>>>>when they're ready (although I suspect many of you will be able to guess 
>>>>what that will be).
>>>
>>>I would like to thank this group for making their minutes and meeting 
>>>transcripts public.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> The meetings are closed and minutes are edited. Haven't we had enough of 
>> that? 
>
>Point taken.  I'll just add that even edited minutes are informative. 
>I'd be very interested in reading the XFree86 BOD and core team 
>discussions...even edited ones.

The difference is that this group of vested interests uses "openness"
as a large part of their claim to credibility.  In my experience,
the XFree86 BOD and core team does not and never has.  If the vested
interests want to retain any of that credibility, they need to stop
making excuses about the way they're operating, and be measured
against their *own* metrics.  There are lots of ways they could do
that, but they are choosing a method that can easily be manipulated
to suit their vested interests.  It's a facade of transparency,
not real transparency.

Speaking for myself.

David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer                     The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.