On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Saturday 12 April 2003 18:31, [email protected] wrote:
> > Of course. And I would expect each participant would pay their respective
> > share. I would also be suspect if any corporate entity were to pay for or
> > reimburse for the services, as I would be if any of the participants are
> > compensated for their time or expenses in participating. Of course
> > donations from individuals to the a governing non-profit would be usable
> > to cover such expenses, though I don't believe that such an entity exists
> > yet.
> >
>
> Ever tried to have a meeting with a group of people that exceeds 15 to 20,
> you'll get the kind of unresolvedness that can be found from the UN general
> meeting. In short, that's unworkable.
My point makes no assertions as to how productive the medium or
methodology is, and hence I find no context for your comment. A conference
call based on a 900 number for North American participants quickly
addresses a large chunk of who pays and how. Surely there are
international methods too, though I don't have beckground in such.
- Marc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.