Re: Discussing issues

Havoc Pennington <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:23:23PM -0400, David Dawes wrote: 
> I don't understand why this is even an issue.  Right now, Jane Doe
> can collect all of the pieces she's interested in and create an
> XJane release whenever she wants.  Whoever needs a "release" can
> create one that suits their needs, and on a schedule that suits
> them.  Don't the Linux vendors effectively do this already?  Isn't
> that an important part of the value they add to the free stuff they
> sell?
> 

Noooooooooo. Emphatically no. I actively kick Red Hat specific changes
out of my packages for example, as fast as I possibly can. They are
there as stopgaps or workarounds. The only exception is cosmetic stuff
that's easily maintainable separately, such as our theme and default
configuration.

All Red Hat would get out of diversity in X implementations would be
a) more work for us and b) platform fragmentation. Both negatives.
Trying to make "we have the only working X, with proprietary API
enhancements" some kind of selling point would be a great way to shoot
a big hole in our foot.

Not speaking for Red Hat.

Havoc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.