Re: Discussing issues
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
G O Economou wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:11:38 -0400, Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> wrote: >> And then as a side note, why don't we address the X.org relationship >> while we're at it, and just get X cleaned up and fixed as a whole. > > And you Havoc have this power to speak for X.org. To make things happen > there? I mean, you guys can talk all day and make divisions all you want, > but unless someone on the other side can bring it home, this whole > discussion > is meaningless. No, but those who do speak for X.org have spoken and said they are looking to redefine X.org and it's relationship with XFree86: http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2003-March/000554.html -- -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Sun Software Group Quality, Integration, & Customer Success (QICS) Platform Globalization Engin. - X11 Engineering