Re: Discussing issues

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 03:18:56PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
> >> >Let me be crystal clear: this is NOT a favorable outcome while I'm
> >> >wearing any of my hats, from Red Hat to freedesktop.org to just plain
> >> >old Havoc.
> >> 
> >> And neither is any outcome that disenfranchises those XFree86
> >> developers with the most time and effort invested in XFree86 itself.
> >> 
> >
> >Great, so let's design a third outcome.
> >
> >Strawman proposal: we create a fairly open infrastructure/process
> 
> I guess you really don't get it.  Improved communication/dialogue
> somehow got morphed into a whole new infrastructure and bureaucratic
> process?  You're joking, right?

I don't understand. In what I proposed, you would make a release with
the same group you do now, using the same process you do now.

What is the new bureaucracy that I proposed?

I did not propose new infrastructure either - I proposed sharing an
infrastructure. I don't care whether it's an existing one or not.

Specifically, what do you object to in the strawman proposal?

Or if you object to the whole thing, can you make your own proposal?

I'm not religious here. Anything that's going to work, great.  Let's
just please solve the problem...

Havoc