Re: License FAQs
"georgina o. economou" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
?One thing that would be helpfull clarifying would be : do you consider >documentation as software or not. I know there is a bunch of people who >consider everything that comes in digital form as software, while other don't. >So either way, it would be nice to add this clarification to the place where ?>you speak about artwork. That's a valid point about the FDL and documentation. Even CreativeCommons recommends the FDL: ( http://creativecommons.org/learn/licenses/ ) _If you are interested in licensing software documentation or other supporting text for a piece of code, we recommend the GNU Free Documentation License._ I am not sure how the Board considers documentation. I know that our website is copyrighted and must be reproduced in full with attribution and such. I think that this license is close in spirit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/1.0/ but then I could be utterly wrong. I don't make decisions, I do interpretations. I'll cc the Board and let them know of of the issue and then make the appropriate changes. Thanks for the catch. _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!