Re: New licence and driver SDK ?
Nicolas Boulay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le Mercredi 3 Mars 2004 20:15, Alexander Terekhov a écrit : > nicolas wrote: > [...] > > > This point is only there to avoid that the code did not return to the > > communauty. > > I have no problem whatsoever with the obligation to return DERIVATIVE > code (read: bug fixes, optimizations, whatever MODIFICATIONS) back to > the community. Even when I do not distribute the derivative code. That > is "quid pro quo" (one thing in return for another). I do have serious > problem with the FSF's "everything in return for something" idiotic > interpretation of the GPL that has no legal basis under the copyright > law. http://www.linuxdevices.com/files/misc/gpl-proposed-rev3.pdf > ??? But that's clear ! Where do you put the borderline ? That's always the same problem ! I will prefer a means to define clearly what should be GPL for each interface but that could be tricky to handle. nicO > regards, > alexander. > > -- > http://www.eclipse.org/legal/legalfaq.html > _______________________________________________ > Forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/forum