Re: License issues
mark kandianis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 06:20 AM 3/5/2004 +0100, you wrote: >Hello, > >As director of an Open Source advocating company, I feel the urge to >respond to recent license changes. I'm sure you received lots of email >regarding the license change, so let me get straight to the point: > >Does the benefit of changing the license, supercede the disadvantages of >exclusion of 4.4.0 in several major Linux and BSD UNIX distributors? > >I think every Open Source developer deserves respect and credit for their >work, but doesn't this rather arrogant attitude take some of that respect >away? Many people see you as not true devout Open Source contributors. Is >the change to the new license worth all this fuss? > >If yes, what will happen now? Many distributors refuse to incorporate non >GPL-compatible code into their releases. There are many plans to fork and >build a real open source (thus GPL-compatible) implementation of X11R6. so you mean that only a GPL-compatible X implementation is foss? don't think so. and can i have a link to your advocate site? i like to click ;-) mark.