Re: License issues
David Dawes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:10:25PM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote: >As it is now, the XFree86 license reflects the "worst-case" licenses The "worst-case" is actually a little worse -- SGI's GLX licence, which is not only GPL-incompatible, but is not "Free Software" (in the FSF sense). So, the X server and the GL libraries have been GPL-incompatible since at least XFree86 4.0 for this reason alone. >that were already being used by individual contributors, and to me it >does nothing but make clear what distributors must do in order to comply >with the license of the entire XFree86 distribution. Distributors whining >about the license "change" conveniently ignore the fact that they were >already distributing code in violation of the contributors' licenses. This and the GLX issue beg obvious questions of many distributors and other projects using pre-licence-change versions of XFree86. Maybe they can all make some sort of clear statement about their licensing policy so that eveyone knows where they stand. A little consistency would go a long way. David