FW: Re: Xfree86 4.4 vs Xorg Wrap-up

"georgina o. economou" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 --- On Sat 03/27, Daniel Stone &lt; [email protected] &gt; wrote:
From: Daniel Stone [mailto: [email protected]]To: [email protected]: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:23:02 -0800Subject: Re: Xfree86 4.4 vs Xorg Wrap-upOn Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:44:49AM -0500, Francois Isabelle wrote:&gt; Is that what's happening ?&gt; 1 - XFree86 changed licensing, which introduced some GPL compatibility&gt; issues and some deviations to debian DFSG(debian free software&gt; guidelines).&gt; 2 - Some are arguing that the new licensing is NOT GPL incompatible, but&gt; nobody argues that it is not deviating from DFSG&gt; 3 - Xorg forked XFree86 due to these licensing considerations&gt; 4 - Debian will NOT include XFree86 4.4 components &gt; 5 - Other Linux's distributions MIGTH include Xfree86 4.4&gt; 6 - Other Linux's distributions WILL include Xorg&gt; 7 - Debian MIGHT include Xorg, MIGHT include XFree86
  4.4 in non-free or&gt; similarDebian will include freedesktop.org's xlibs/xserver/et al, 
 assumingnothing spectacular happens.&gt; 8 - End users / developpers / distribution packagers WILL end up&gt; confused, free software activist will end up frustrated and I WILL NOT&gt; understand why this FORK took place anyway.It's quite simple: XFree86 made their software unsustainable with thenew license.&gt; - I'm not sure they have sufficient resources to provide the quality&gt; level we've come to expect from the XFree86 team.I think they have better resources than XFree86.&gt; - I think a FORK is a really bad thing especially on projects&gt; that large, how can contributors enhance BOTH projects... wasted work I&gt; beleive.That's your opinion.&gt; - Even if free software is taking up over proprietary stuff, there are&gt; external forces that are hitting free software day after day, why MUST&gt; the free software community hit itself from the INSIDE ?I don't know. Ask those who d
 ecided to change the licence.&gt; Please, correct me if I'm wrong. But don't spend too muc
 h time on point&gt; '8' , I know I'm right about this one.OK, I won'
t bother arguing. Saves me time anyway.And the disk-space issue is fixed.-- Daniel Stone Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.orgAttachment: signature.asc (0.19KB)

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 190 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAZR3GcPClnTztfv0RAjBsAKCP1R13IQaePUCVEC61VF0GrbXR/ACeMEfJ
ioAT9/Is9zgvpiCegBj+sXk=
=GJZB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.