RE: Mission statement and 1.1 license issues

> This difference is not something which I think is made 
> obvious in any license agreement contained in the 4.3.0, 
> (which is fine, as it is not a licensing issue).  Whether it 
> is obvious from your mission statement or not depends on 
> whether readers assume that the statement supplements or 
> replaces what I consider to have become the normal, unwritten 
> rules and standards by which the free, open source community operates.
> 
> John.

If this is now the open source operates, surely you can site historical
evidence of it.  Otherwise, I would assume this is a recent discovery of
your own.

Rich