Re: License furor

mark kandianis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 06:39 PM 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>mark kandianis wrote:
>>man, i think that you're spreading fud.  a quick check of the archives 
>>don't show anything like that.
>>i think you're over-reacting.
>
>Now you're speading the fud.  I'm not saying this stuff, people on the 
>Fedora list are.  They think that I'm overreacting in my objections for 
>XFree86 not being included in Fedora Core 2.  It's a lovely thread that I 
>started , subject "XFree86 gone from Fedora Core? WHY!?", date 05/20/2004 
>09:29 PM.  You can look for yourself on the Fedora list archives.


found it man.
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-May/msg05005.html

and i agree with your others point, i don't care for mailing lists, 
and  x.org etc. is definitely _the Man_
and it would be snowy day in miami before i supported him.  i don't really 
go for this corporate bullying
a bunch of volunteers.  i guess they aren't supplying my mortgage so i 
don't have to be like those other losers.

i see a flak responded to you about x.org is going to put in _new_ features.
that'd be an improvement since they didn't do much for the first release 
;-)  if they are any good we
can take them and not have to attribute them because they don't believe in 
that.  what comes around goes
around, eh?

my apologies all around man.

mark.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.