Re: License furor

Paul Vojta wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:19:59PM -0400, mark kandianis wrote:
>>At 06:39 PM 5/24/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>>found it man.
>>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-May/msg05005.html
> 
> OK, so I looked there, and read through a lot of messages, consisting mostly
> of a lot of back-and-forth of the same low quality as you see in this mailing
> list (present company excluded, of course :-)).
> 
> I think references to "the man" might be a little too obscure for at least
> some people on this list.  If you're saying that x.org is too strongly
> tied to corporate interests, then please point me to where in that thread
> you drew that conclusion from.  As I see it, the thread (very slowly)
> confirms my preference for x.org over xfree86.
> 

You might want to be read some of the other messages in this thread. 
I've quoted several times an article from The Inquirer on both this 
thread and the one on the Fedora list, and someone else explained quite 
feverently what the problem is with X.org.

Peace,
William