Re: (huge tangent away from) the removal of Packard
Alan Cox <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I'll take your word for it. How much of that is Red Hat people, and how much > of it is Precision Insight->VA Linux->Red Hat people? > > DRI isn't XFree86, FWIW. Cyrix driver fixup - Red Hat people Palmax pen driver - Red Hat people Porting/merging the stylistic driver - Red Hat people URGear driver - Red Hat people (admittedly motivated by a desire to kick ass at quake not corporate policy) I believe Mike Harris did a chunk of work on improving 2D acceleration on Radeon using DRI, but that may have been solely backporting stuff to older releases. > Apple/MacOS. The point of the loadable server was so that XFree86 could get > out of the driver space and vendors could deal with their own drivers. Maybe you are right, maybe its an education thing. If so the question becomes 'What is the best way for people to find the current driver for XYZ' > etc, for the last 3 years. People working on Open Source desktop > environments/apps could learn a LOT from spending a few days in an AOL call > center... I've spent some time working at a telco. I can second your opinion 8) Alan