Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Kurt Wall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
An unnamed Administration source, Egbert Eich, wrote: % Keith Packard writes: % > % > Current XFree86 governance is not a precise mirror of current commitment to % > the window system. Most of the current board of directors have not been % > involved in the window system for years. If you feel that the core team is % > responsible for governance, then even within that body there are many % > members who have greatly contributed in the past, but who have moved on to % > other interests. I feel it is the responsibility of those who are no % > longer involved in the window system to abdicate their authority. % % On the XFree86 core team we have no procedure to 'retire' people. [...] True. They are simply expelled and publicly slandered. Or, rather, that's how it looks from here, absent the release of clarifying information by XFree86 and/or Keith Packard. Kurt -- The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman Augustine