Re: protocol enhancements

Marc Aurele La France <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 07:23:28AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> committed to continuing to work on older X servers, and nobody is
> >> going to go the X12 route (break back compat). So new stuff is always
> >> either a library you can install regardless of your X server
> >> (e.g. fontconfig) or an extension that we use only optionally
> >> (e.g. RENDER).

> >Both Gtk and X11 are going to break horribly in the next few years and
> >there is going to be a need for X.org, XFree or someone to actually fix
> >the standards to allow over 65535 pixels width and height. Otherwise you
> >are not going to be able to run X11 on your walls or on ultra fine
> >resolution displays.

> Absolutely, and I'm glad to see someone else thinking about future
> hardware/technology.  This is an issue I've been trying to get some
> traction on internally, but it has been difficult.  For example,
> the responses I get (from Jim and Keith in particular) are like
> "that's not relevant, and won't be for 5-10 years", and "it will
> break the protocol", etc.  That's very short-sighted.  Xinerama
> with enough high-res screens can come close today (I can never
> remember if the limit is 32767 or 65535).  I'm sure that there'll

As Jim has already pointed out, the limit is 32767.

> be other issues exposed as we start working towards this.  I'd like
> to see at a minimum that the X server internals, and any proposed
> re-writes thereof in the context of 5.0, are prepared for this and
> for deeper and non-integer pixel types.  I also think that bumping
> the protocol minor revision should be explored as a backward-compatible
> mechanism for enhancing the core protocol.  For those who don't
> know, the X11 protocol has a so-far unused provision for a
> client/server protocol handshake, and this type of detail can be
> embedded in Xlib.  There's no need to go to "X12" to do this, or
> to keep tacking on miscellaneous extensions to deal with what are
> core protocol issues.

Extensions have the advantage of allowing for independence.  Also, there's
already a handshake in place:  Client says "Do you support extension XYZ?"
and Server answers yes or no.

Marc.

+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|  Marc Aurele La France           |  work:   1-780-492-9310           |
|  Computing and Network Services  |  fax:    1-780-492-1729           |
|  352 General Services Building   |  email:  [email protected]          |
|  University of Alberta           +-----------------------------------+
|  Edmonton, Alberta               |                                   |
|  T6G 2H1                         |     Standard disclaimers apply    |
|  CANADA                          |                                   |
+----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
XFree86 Core Team member.  ATI driver and X server internals.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.