Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development

Randy Kramer wrote:
> On Monday 24 March 2003 09:03 am, David Wexelblat wrote:
> 
>>I said I wouldn't post the EMAIL in public. I always said that I'd be
>>glad to post the evidence in public, if someone could suggest a way
>>to do it that didn't involve publicly posting email. I suggested that
>>an independent audit of the email might be an alternative.
>>
>>No one has suggested any solution other than posting the email.
> 
> 
> I thought about volunteering as an auditor earlier -- presume that would 
> involve reading the relevant emails and expressing a judgement.  So, 
> I'll volunteer.  
> 
> Maybe there are others more qualified / impartial?
> 
> Maybe there should be a committee (consisting of an odd number of 
> "auditors"?)

Yay.  Let's elect them from the community...  ;-)

I actually think the issue of who said what to whom in the core team is much 
less important than the question of what happens now.  Keith P. isn't the big 
issue -- everyone else is.

Keith