RE: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development

"David Wexelblat" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <008001c2f23c$bdb090e0$bc74020a@TANTHALAS>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy Kramer
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [forum] A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
> 
> 
> On Monday 24 March 2003 09:03 am, David Wexelblat wrote:
> > I said I wouldn't post the EMAIL in public. I always said 
> > that I'd be glad to post the evidence in public, if someone
> > could suggest a way to do it that didn't involve publicly
> > posting email. I suggested that an independent audit of the
> > email might be an alternative.
> >
> > No one has suggested any solution other than posting the email.
> 
> I thought about volunteering as an auditor earlier -- presume 
> that would involve reading the relevant emails and expressing a
> judgement.  So, I'll volunteer.  
> 

We (the Core Team and Keith Packard) are currently discussing how best to go
about this. Keith has changed his position on disclosing his emails; we are
waiting for the rest of the Core Team members involved in the relevent
thread to object or consent to their emails being disclosed (everyone needs
the same level of courtesy on the issues of disclosing private email). We
are also discussing appointing some sort of auditing "team".

> Maybe there are others more qualified / impartial?
> 

Impartial is obviously critical. I'm not sure about qualified. If we go this
route, I guess I sort of see the outcome being a clean-room synopsis of the
email/timeline, with opportunity to review & comment by both sides, which I
don't think requires any particular expertise.

> Maybe there should be a committee (consisting of an odd number of 
> "auditors"?)

Definitely more than one. I don't think there's any voting, per se, so I
don't think there's a need for an odd number - there's no winner or loser
here, simply an indepdently-generated synopsis for others to draw their own
conclusions from.

> Randy Kramer

Thanks for volunteering. I figure we'll sort out what to do about this in
the next 24 hours or so.

-- 
David Wexelblat, Chief Architect    mailto:[email protected]
America Online, Inc                 http://www.aol.com/
44900 Prentice Drive - 24B:P08      (703) 265-1158 (voice)
Dulles, VA 20166                    (703) 265-1301 (fax)
	
Please send private email to: mailto:[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.