Re: How about running X on top of something else?
"Kendall Bennett" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Organization | SciTech Software, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <3E808195.17700.28EBCC6F@localhost> |
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> wrote: > You can write an XFree86 driver within the current driver model > that is built on top of something else like GGI. Nobody has done > it. Actually that is not entirely true. We did it 3-4 years ago when we released the SciTech Nucleus drivers for Linux based on XFree86 3.3.x. We proved it could be done, but we didn't get a very good reception for the product and our OS/2 product took off at the same time and sapped all our resources. We are doing it again now with the new SciTech SNAP Graphics for Linux that we are about to start external beta testing with. This time around we are using XFree86 4 loadable modules and simply plug into existing XFree86 installations (ie: no need to upgrade your XFree86 install just to get support for the latest Intel Springdale chipsets for instance ;-). One of the biggest problems we had with the 3.3.6 server was customisations that people had in their servers that got lost when we installed our server, and the XFree86 4 module system has completely eliminated those issues for us. > I even gave a personal invitation to do this to the GGI folks years > ago and they declined. Just curious, but what exactly is XGGI? I don't know much about it these days (gave up following GGI 3 years ago or so ;-), but I always figured it was an XFree86 module that used GGI (like our drivers are). Is that not the case? Regards, --- Kendall Bennett Chief Executive Officer SciTech Software, Inc. Phone: (530) 894 8400 http://www.scitechsoft.com ~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~