Re: About our effort at NoMachine

Martin Konold <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Organization erfrakon
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch, 26. MÀrz 2003 19:41 schrieb rudy BERRY:

Hi,

> Like the apache gzip module does with the http streams ?
> by this way, yes , it could be a real win . Note that i think it could
> be implemented in the actual versions of Xfree .

IMHO in most cases low network bandwith also means need for encryption. 
Therefor using the built in compression of ssh or equivalent is imho more 
efficient than putting compression in X11.

Things are totally different in the local case. The local case is compared to 
the network already high bandwidth / low latency. But even in the local case 
bandwith might be a limiting factor. I think that in the local case improving 
the IPC mechanism is the main goal. E.g. in contrast to what most people 
think SYS V SHM is _not_ the fastest IPC mechanism on Linux.

Regards,
-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold

e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.