Re: xfree86 mailing list policy (was: Xr/Xc and SVG status)
"georgina o economou" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3E7A08B4.00004F.01268@persephone> |
-------Original Message------- From: [email protected] Date: Thursday, March 20, 2003 01:15:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [forum] xfree86 mailing list policy (was: Xr/Xc and SVG status) On Mar 20, Egbert Eich wrote: > Yes, these lists have been removed to simplify the structure. > > We may have to consider to have special purpose lists for these > topics. Is there any public policy about how list management is controlled? Who decides what lists exist? Who decides when several lists are merged together? What would it take for a new potential developer to propose a new mailing list? -Carl What exactly do you and Egbert have against one devel and one bug tracking list? The kernel works with one list, and not even an official other one for subtopics. If you belong like I do to linux-fbdev you will get linux-fbdev and kernel when they cross post? Why not do the same? Go to sourceforge, make a list and then cross post? Georgina
IMSTP.gif
(image/gif, 494 B) - not displayed