Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org

Sven Luther <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <20030329080031.GA1755@iliana>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 05:58:49PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: 
> > The most common solution to this problem seems to be maintaining seperate
> > branches for seperate needs - Current vs Stable in many projects, 2.2 vs. 2.4 vs 2.5
> > in the Linux kernel world, etc.  The proposed "standard" branch vs XFree86 branch
> > is just another way of naming them, and a slightly different way of managing them.
> > Perhaps simply doing stable, current, and maybe experimental branches is a simpler
> > path.
> 
> Here are some differences between the usual solution and the
> SSI-maintained branch:
> 
>  - In the usual model, maintainers of a module own that module on both
>    stable and devel branches of said module.
> 
>  - Stable branches are bugfixes-only. Feature backports are evil,

What about bugfixes and new card support ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.