Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.xfree86.forum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 11:42:12AM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> Drop xterm, twm, old X toolkits, PCF/BDF fonts, etc.

Umm, why?  xterm is still a _lot_ more useable than any of the gnome/kde
windowmanager.  twm is also nice to have - I switch back to after a
while everytime I install a new Linux Distribution when I'm finally fed
up with the desktop enviroment.

Now we could argue whether we really need one big X (or XFree) source
tree or should rather have Xserver, Xlib, <foo>extentsion, xterm,
twm, smaple-client packages.  I think such a split up would make lot of
sense and allow more fine-grained release.  I guess there's also
arguments against this, so people who have them please speak up.

> We need just basic X APIs, sufficient for GTK and Qt toolkit to be 
> operational.
> Motif support, etc. should be dropped ASAP.

Motif is not part of X, it's just yet another toolkit.  And lots of
applications still need it, even on Linux.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.