Re: Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Vadim Plessky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.forum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 31 March 2003 02:19, Ben Jansens wrote: | On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 10:12:01PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote: | > On Sunday 30 March 2003 20:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote: | > | On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:23:47PM +0400, Vadim Plessky wrote: | > | > Well, GNOME and KDE cover together about 95% of Linux Desktops. | > | | > | Where did you get this estimate from? | > | > That number has been discussed/quoted many times. | > Estimation I have seen and feel comfortable with os that KDE has 60% | > share, and GNOME - 30%, while the rest is splitted around other WMs or | > environments. My estimationn though that KDE has slightly higher share | > (about 65%), so combined GNOME+KDE is about 95% | | Well I'm glad we have an estimate that you feel comfortable with instead | of a solid emperical result. I don't know of any reliable studies done | which can give a number to this statistic. Forums polls just wont do for | accurate data. Those figures have nothing to do with forum polls. Check http://www.ofb.biz, Mandrake is clear leader (which is not the case if you take paid Linux boxes with per-seat license or whatever) | | > | > Should XFree86 make focus on 95% of its users or focus on needs of | > | > minority? | > | | > | XFree86 should not enforce policy on toolkits/windowmanagers _at | > | all_. | > | > Well, toolkit/desktop users want , say, window transparency - and | > developers for those toolkits/desktops can't implement transparency | > until it's get done on XFree86 level. | > Like it or not, but XFree86 has influence on all GUI-based Linux/*BSD | > apps. | | Everything seems to always come down to transparency. In my option, this | is a small issue to the overall development of the XFree project. I think | far to much emphasis is put on this in arguments for server enhancements. MacOS X has it, so I think we should have it too. | | > | successfull because it doesn't enforce policy. You can use gnome/kde | > | or twm+xterm over the same protocol, with the same hardware drivers | > | and even use some gnome app under twm or the other way around. | > | Changing this is a very bad idea. | > | > You can't use modern X apps (KDE, GNOME) with TWM, or other not | > NetWM-enabled Window Manager. This is just one example. | | While this is not even entirely true, I'll give you the benefit of the | doubt since _some_ things about these applications may not behave correctly | in a WM without NetWM support. This is not an example of how the X server Have you ever tried Konqueror or Kmail or nautilus from TWM? | needs to be updated to meet the needs of the "95%" however. This is | entirely a protocol between one client and another. | | Ben -- Best Regards, Vadim Plessky SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released http://svgicons.sourceforge.net