Re: XFree86's Future and thoughts and suggestions

On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 01:14, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> Sending it to Xpert is the wrong place. Patches should be submitted to the
> XFree86 bugzilla, where is can be properly tracked. Before the recent addition
> of the bugzilla, patches should be sent to [email protected] or
> [email protected]. That is where the people committing changes are looking
> for stuff.
> 
> If something just dies or falls in a crack somewhere never to be heard from
> again, that's a bad thing. The bugzilla was set up to reduce the chances of
> that happening.

Hello:

I have been following this discussion for a while now. I am starting to
get a little tired. ;-)

Instead of making whole sale changes in the way things are done, can
both sides of this discussion start by taking small steps?

The bugzilla currently has *nothing* in it.

So ... the people who are complaining that they're being
ignored/unfairly rejected/conspired against ;-) please resubmit patches
that they feel need a second look.

The people who claim they're completely open to the community's input
should actually *demonstrate* their willingness by commenting on the
status of every patch in the queue (applied/pending/rejected/etc).

This is all 'meta' work and doesn't actually get us anywhere. I figure
we all need to show our willingness to work together.

-- b

PS: I may actually have no idea what I'm talking about. If so, feel free
to tell me to be quiet. ;-)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Biju 'botsie' Chacko                        biju_chacko at vsnl dot net
http://www.symonds.net/~botsie          Public Key available on request
-----------------------------------------------------------------------