Re: interesting article on XFree86 speed
<[email protected]> Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:05:15 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.xfree86.render |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sorry if this is a mostly a repeat: my mailer hiccupped. Yes, 20ms is an eternity, unless you are going long haul or via low bandwith lingks. I think there is alot going wrong here: 1) stupid toolkits 2) stupid apps that do unnecessary repaints. I've often detected apps repainting N times where one would do (try running X on a dialup line sometime: it is enlightening to see how stupid some apps/toolkits have been). 3) there are some places where the X protocol should be fixed. See Hania Gajewska, Mark Mark Manasse's, and Joel McCormack's paper at http://www.std.org/msm/common/WhyX.pdf. OK, there are a number of things we can/should do about it: 1) Keith has managed to get the X protocol dumper out from under restrictive license. There are, however, a bunch of versions to be reconciled: help here would be appreciated, to make this tool widely usable by lots of people. 2) fix broken toolkits and apps. 3) Keith and I chatted with Owen about what to do with his small extension to fix embedding, and have come to the conclusion we need a "fix the protocol" extension, to fix items that matter (some of what Hania/Mark/Joel complained about probably don't matter in current contexts). Names for this effort greatly appreciated (otherwise we'll just call it the "Norm" extension: see if you can figure out the etimology of that name). - Jim -- Jim Gettys Cambridge Research Laboratory HP Labs, Hewlett-Packard Company [email protected]