Re: Some comments on Xr on Xc

On 23 Nov, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> |  The plan is to support only the UTF8 encoding. So, can we drop all of
> |  the 8/16/32/Utf8 distinctions from Xft?
> 
> What about UTF-16?
> I think it's required to display, say, Chinese glyphs.

That is a misunderstanding of UTF.  UTF-8 has no problems with either
the glyphs in the BMP or with the additional glyphs in the extended
pages.  There are many compatibility related reasons to stick
exclusively with UTF-8.

R Horn