Re: Next relase and roadmap

Roman Dobosz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel
Organization ElysiuM deeZine
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:33:38 +0200
Alexandru Lazar <[email protected]> wrote:

(I'm somehow missed your post)

> > I'm wondering if there are plans regarding rewriting wmaker to be an
> > compositor on wayland? I know, that wayland is not widely used yet,
> > but eventually it will replace X stack. Probably ;). Thoughts?
> 
> I've been toying with the idea of writing a compositor with a NeXT-like
> interface as a way to get myself acquainted with Wayland.
> 
> Sadly, I haven't taken it past the "toying with" stage because, as far
> as I can tell, Wayland-related documentation is somewhere between
> outdated, abysmal and absent.

Are you referring to this[1]? If so, than indeed, five year old docs
for constantly changing project seems not good at all.

> That being said, unless they manage to mess up Wayland really, really
> bad, I don't think X11 will be very relevant 4-6 years from now. Wayland
> has a lot of big commercial Linux players behind it -- and those (by
> which I mean that, by which I really mean Canonical) who aren't behind
> it aren't behind X11 anyway.

Seems like Wayland is not-there-yet[2], although it is used by
default as display server for Fedora with different effect (it
doesn't play well for my co-workers laptop). That's pity. OTOH it
seems, that commercial Linux players (as you have it phrased) have
strong motivation for making X obsolete, hence my question. Well,
time will tell, how long X will last.

[1] https://wayland.freedesktop.org/docs/html/
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F25_bugs#Wayland_issues

-- 
Roman Dobosz


-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.