Re: [PATCH] New library wmgeneral
"Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.compw.window-managers.windowmaker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Alexey I. Froloff" <[email protected]> escribió: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 05:42:41PM +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote: >> This patch includes the library wmgeneral. > Please, don't do it! There's already libdockapp, why would we > need yet another _shared_ library with, like, five functions? > What are you trying to fix? Does it really worth it? You only > make things harder for a package maintainers. > > Better rewrite those applets to libdockapp. Hi Alexey, both, wmgeneral and libdockapp are used in a lot of applications: kix@kentin:~/src/dockapps$ rgrep wmgeneral * | cut -d/ -f1 | uniq -c | grep -v binar 1 dockapps.db.in:This app is based on the wmgeneral code." 105 libwmgeneral 57 wmbiff 4 wmCalClock 12 wmckgmail 10 wmcpufreq 14 wmfsm 13 wmifs 8 wmitime 10 wmkeys 4 wmmon 2 wmnotify 1 wmpower 11 wmppp.app 8 wmsm.app 5 wmSMPmon 7 wmsun 43 wmtime 5 wmtv 10 wmtz 2 wmWeather kix@kentin:~/src/dockapps$ rgrep libdockapp * | cut -d/ -f1 | uniq -c | grep -v binar | grep -v dockapps 26 libdockapp 14 wmacpi 2 wmacpiload 2 wmbatteries 2 wmcalendar 1 wmclock 10 wmcpuload 2 wmmemload 1 wmmenu 3 wmpower 5 wmwifi kix@kentin:~/src/dockapps$ Probably we should join both libraries in only one, but now, why do not create the libwmgeneral lib? There are more dockapps using libwmgeneral than libdockapp. As Doug said, with the new gcc version we need change a lot of dockapps, and this is the reason to create this library. The patch about the library is easy to include in the repo, we can update all dockapps using wmgeneral, remove the wmgenal folders and update the code. IMO is better have only one library than the same code in 20 different dockapps/folders. Cheers, kix Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) http://www.kix.es/ -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].